Victims of Trafficking: A Practical Guide to Criminal Defence and Appeals by Stephen Knight & Margo Munro Kerr published by Law Brief Publishing

The British state claims to pride itself on the treatment afforded to victims of trafficking. It claims to be a world leader in the treatment of victims. So why does it fail so many of them? Why is it that the first time many victims of trafficking have their trafficking status raised in the criminal courts, they are appealing against a wrongful conviction that came about because of their status as a victim of trafficking?

In this book we provide a user-friendly guide aimed at practitioners working on criminal appeals for victims of trafficking. A reader who picks up the book today should be able to put it down fully armed for how to deal with trafficking cases right through from arrest to appeal.

It is our intention to prepare the reader not just for trafficking appeals, but to recognise trafficking cases, and the arguments that can be used in them, before anything goes wrong. In this way, we hope to show both how trafficking victims are failed, but also how to stop such failures from happening.

By preventing and overturning the wrongful convictions of trafficking victims we can prevent the further traumatisation of victims, and prevent the creation of an environment which facilitates trafficking.

The book can be purchased here. We hope to have a book launch event after the summer recess.

Related Barristers: Stephen Knight, Margo Munro Kerr

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

news
Brenda Efurhievwe’s article “Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals” published on Free Movement
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe
cases
Olivia succeeds in judicial review challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing for IPP prisoner
Olivia succeeded in challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing on grounds of procedural unfairness and a breach of Article 5(4) ECHR.
Olivia Beach
publications
“Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals – a light at the end of the tunnel?”
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe