Jonathan Adler featured in BBC investigation into hair strand testing in the Family Court

Jonathan Adler has been featured in a BBC investigation examining concerns surrounding the interpretation of hair strand testing evidence in Family Court proceedings.

The article explores the growing scrutiny around the use and interpretation of hair strand drug testing in care proceedings, and the potentially life-changing consequences these results can have for families.

Jonathan acted for a mother in proceedings where hair strand testing evidence was challenged alongside other evidence before the court. During cross-examination of an expert witness, Jonathan raised alternative explanations for the reported findings, including the potential impact of hair straighteners on the movement of ketamine traces within the hair sample.

The expert accepted that these factors could affect interpretation and conceded that the mother’s account was, on the balance of probabilities, truthful. The local authority subsequently agreed that the child could return home.

Read the BBC article and listen to the full BBC programme here.

Related Barristers: Jonathan Adler

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

news
Brenda Efurhievwe’s article “Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals” published on Free Movement
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe
cases
Olivia succeeds in judicial review challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing for IPP prisoner
Olivia succeeded in challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing on grounds of procedural unfairness and a breach of Article 5(4) ECHR.
Olivia Beach
publications
“Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals – a light at the end of the tunnel?”
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe