Gender Recognition Panel decision set aside by the Family Division of the High Court in successful pro bono appeal under the Gender Recognition Act 2004

Allan Briddock and Catherine Jaquiss from One Pump Court, DAC Beachcroft and 39 Essex Chambers have successfully represented a pro bono client in her appeal against a decision by the Gender Recognition Panel (GRP) to refuse to grant a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).[1]

A GRC allows people in England and Wales to have their affirmed gender legally recognised. Once granted, the person’s acquired gender becomes their sex “for all purposes”.

At the time of making the application, the appellant – known as AB – had lived as female for more than a decade. Despite providing evidence in support of her application, the GRP refused to issue a GRC on the basis that the evidence was insufficient.

Allowing the appeal on all three grounds, Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, and Mrs Justice Lieven found that the GRP had erred in its approach to the evidence necessary to determine whether an individual was “living in the acquired gender”.

The GRP’s decision was also found to be procedurally unfair as AB had not been given the opportunity to address the panel’s concerns.

The court set the GRP’s decision aside and granted the GRC.

AB says, “I would like to thank everyone for their pro bono support with this whole matter. I saw a lot of work going into this case, and it means a lot that you were there to help me.”

Alistair Robertson adds, “We are delighted to have been able to support AB and to have helped her achieve such an excellent result. This case not only provides very clear guidance for the GRP going forwards, but also clarifies the approach the appellate courts will take to fresh evidence when retaking a decision.”

Allan Briddock and Catherine Jaquiss of One Pump Court were led by Lisa Giovannetti KC of 39 Essex Chambers, instructed by Partner Alistair Robertson, Legal Director Sophie Devlin, Senior Associate Amy Smith and Trainee Solicitor Awen Edwards from @DAC Beachcroft LLP. Successfully securing the appeal in favour of their client.

[1] AB v GRP [2024] EWHC 1456 (Fam)

Related Barristers: Allan Briddock, Catherine Jaquiss

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

news
Joseph Maggs's article “Upper Tribunal provides further guidance on standard of proof in asylum claims” published on Free Movement
​Joseph Maggs's new article on section 32 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 and the higher standard of proof in asylum claims has been published on Free Movement.
Joseph Maggs
cases
Jury concludes that multiple failures in care probably caused JR’s death at HMP Brixton
Frank Bowmaker represented the family of Joe, whose inquest took place from 14 to 24 September 2026.
Frank Bowmaker
cases
Brenda Efurhievwe assists Windrush descendant in challenging deportation and regularising his status
TH is a descendant of Windrush generation parents, who arrived in the UK as a child and lawfully resided in the country for over 50 years.
Brenda Efurhievwe