Gender Recognition Panel decision set aside by the Family Division of the High Court in successful pro bono appeal under the Gender Recognition Act 2004

Allan Briddock and Catherine Jaquiss from One Pump Court, DAC Beachcroft and 39 Essex Chambers have successfully represented a pro bono client in her appeal against a decision by the Gender Recognition Panel (GRP) to refuse to grant a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).[1]

A GRC allows people in England and Wales to have their affirmed gender legally recognised. Once granted, the person’s acquired gender becomes their sex “for all purposes”.

At the time of making the application, the appellant – known as AB – had lived as female for more than a decade. Despite providing evidence in support of her application, the GRP refused to issue a GRC on the basis that the evidence was insufficient.

Allowing the appeal on all three grounds, Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, and Mrs Justice Lieven found that the GRP had erred in its approach to the evidence necessary to determine whether an individual was “living in the acquired gender”.

The GRP’s decision was also found to be procedurally unfair as AB had not been given the opportunity to address the panel’s concerns.

The court set the GRP’s decision aside and granted the GRC.

AB says, “I would like to thank everyone for their pro bono support with this whole matter. I saw a lot of work going into this case, and it means a lot that you were there to help me.”

Alistair Robertson adds, “We are delighted to have been able to support AB and to have helped her achieve such an excellent result. This case not only provides very clear guidance for the GRP going forwards, but also clarifies the approach the appellate courts will take to fresh evidence when retaking a decision.”

Allan Briddock and Catherine Jaquiss of One Pump Court were led by Lisa Giovannetti KC of 39 Essex Chambers, instructed by Partner Alistair Robertson, Legal Director Sophie Devlin, Senior Associate Amy Smith and Trainee Solicitor Awen Edwards from @DAC Beachcroft LLP. Successfully securing the appeal in favour of their client.

[1] AB v GRP [2024] EWHC 1456 (Fam)

Related Barristers: Allan Briddock, Catherine Jaquiss

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

news
Brenda Efurhievwe’s article “Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals” published on Free Movement
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe
cases
Olivia succeeds in judicial review challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing for IPP prisoner
Olivia succeeded in challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing on grounds of procedural unfairness and a breach of Article 5(4) ECHR.
Olivia Beach
publications
“Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals – a light at the end of the tunnel?”
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe