Dharsha Jegatheeswaran secures unanimous not guilty verdict for her client charged with religiously aggravated intentional strangulation

Dharsha Jegatheeswaran’s client was charged with one count of religiously aggravated intentional strangulation.

The Crown’s case was that the Defendant had strangled an employee he supervised at work in an incident fuelled by Islamophobia. The complainant reported the alleged incident to police on the same day it was said to have occurred.

At the conclusion of the trial the jury returned a unanimous verdict of not guilty after less than an hour of deliberation.

Dharsha was instructed by Antoinette Woghiren of A&A Law.

Related Barristers: Dharsha Jegatheeswaran

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

news
LexisNexis publishes a new Practical Guidance Note written in partnership with Katherine Soroya
Drawing on her expertise in the Immigration Tribunals, Katherine Soroya has authored a new Practical Guidance Note for LexisNexis, ‘An introduction to advocacy in the First-tier Tribunal’.
Katherine Soroya
news
Joseph Maggs's article “Upper Tribunal provides further guidance on standard of proof in asylum claims” published on Free Movement
​Joseph Maggs's new article on section 32 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 and the higher standard of proof in asylum claims has been published on Free Movement.
Joseph Maggs
cases
Jury concludes that multiple failures in care probably caused JR’s death at HMP Brixton
Frank Bowmaker represented the family of Joe, whose inquest took place from 14 to 24 September 2026.
Frank Bowmaker