Dharsha Jegatheeswaran secures unanimous not guilty verdict for her client charged with religiously aggravated intentional strangulation

Dharsha Jegatheeswaran’s client was charged with one count of religiously aggravated intentional strangulation.

The Crown’s case was that the Defendant had strangled an employee he supervised at work in an incident fuelled by Islamophobia. The complainant reported the alleged incident to police on the same day it was said to have occurred.

At the conclusion of the trial the jury returned a unanimous verdict of not guilty after less than an hour of deliberation.

Dharsha was instructed by Antoinette Woghiren of A&A Law.

Related Barristers: Dharsha Jegatheeswaran

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

cases
Home Office concedes civil penalty appeal in illegal working case
Allan Briddock and Osborne Clarke successfully represented a large construction company in an appeal against a civil penalty issued by the Home Office for alleged illegal employment.
Allan Briddock
news
Joseph Maggs's article “Licence revocation quashed in Moon Fish but reporting duties still stringent” published on Free Movement
​Joseph Maggs's new article on procedural fairness in the context of sponsor licence revocations has been published on Free Movement.
Joseph Maggs
cases
Joseph Maggs secures acquittal in three-handed robbery/handling stolen goods trial in the Youth Court
Joseph Maggs