Descent Into Authoritarianism? Undermining the Role of Defence Lawyers: The Rajiv Menon KC Case

Garden Court Chambers, Garden Court North Chambers, One Pump Court and Nexus Chambers are pleased to come together to co-host:

‘Descent Into Authoritarianism? Undermining the Role of Defence Lawyers: The Rajiv Menon KC Case’.

The event is online only at 5:30-7:00PM on Wednesday 22 July 2026. You can register to attend here.

pete weatherby kc will chair the event, which will examine the unprecedented prosecution of Garden Court Chambers’ Rajiv Menon KC for alleged contempt of court.

We will bring together speakers from across the human rights legal world, including Baroness Shami Chakrabarti, Lord John Hendy, Michael Mansfield KC, Marcia Willis Stewart KC, Gareth Peirce, Raju Bhatt, Henry Blaxland KC, Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC, Keir Monteith KC, Jane Deighton, Deborah Coles, Matt Foot, Akiko Hart and Sarah-Jane Ewart, with a special message from Ed Fitzgerald KC.

The event will examine the targeting of lawyers as a hallmark of authoritarianism, and the tradition and importance of fearless advocacy in controversial cases.

We will also explore the chilling effect of bringing contempt proceedings regarding comments made in a closing speech and the constitutional importance of jury independence.

Related Barristers: Sarah-Jane Ewart

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

news
Brenda Efurhievwe’s article “Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals” published on Free Movement
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe
cases
Olivia succeeds in judicial review challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing for IPP prisoner
Olivia succeeded in challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing on grounds of procedural unfairness and a breach of Article 5(4) ECHR.
Olivia Beach
publications
“Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals – a light at the end of the tunnel?”
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe