Immigration-related public law
One Pump Court’s immigration team barristers are all highly experienced public law specialists; indeed immigration law is a part of public law, which governs the relationship between individuals and the state. We advise and represent in cases where there is no right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunals and challenges must instead be brought on public law principles, usually through an action for judicial review.
We frequently advise and represent in court on:
- Judicial review of non-appealable decisions
- Injunctions, including the merits of an out-of-hours application
- Challenges to lawfulness of Home Office policy
- Certification of claims as “clearly unfounded”
- Challenges to “deport first appeal later” decisions
- Unlawful detention
- Age disputes
- Deprivation of British nationality and refusal to naturalise
- Allegations of deception and bad character
- Challenges to delays in decision making
We are highly recommended by the leading legal directories for our expertise in immigration-related public law.
Our team
News & Cases
R (HI) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
One Pump Court’s David Chirico KC and Daniel Grütters acted for HI in both the UT and the Court of Appeal, instructed by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants.
David Chirico KC, Daniel Grütters, Joseph Maggs, Emma Talbot
Decision to refuse British nationality on the basis of illegal entry overturned
Victoria Laughton acted for a refugee who had been refused British citizenship on the basis that she was an illegal entrant and therefore of bad character.
Victoria Laughton
Successful challenge to the refusal of entry clearance on the basis of an historical injustice
Emma Stuart King gained a successful outcome in a claim for Judicial Review against a decision to refuse the client, ZR, entry clearance.
Emma Stuart-King