Legal Challenges Training Session: Reconsiderations, Appeals and Judicial Reviews

Claire Physsas will be delivering a training session on Legal Challenges for legal representatives and support workers working with victims of trafficking, for the Anti-Trafficking and Labour Exploitation Unit.

The aim of this course is to equip support workers and legal representatives with the practical skills to prepare reconsideration requests of negative reasonable grounds (RG) and conclusive grounds (CG) decisions. You can expect to discuss and explore examples of challenging by judicial review negative decisions involving survivors of trafficking, including:

– Negative RG and CG decisions
– Public Order and Bad Faith Disqualifications under the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, which deny protections and entitlements to survivors of modern slavery
– Refusals of Discretionary Leave to remain for survivors of modern slavery / Permission to Stay for Victims of Trafficking under the Immigration Rules (VTS leave)
– Refusals of support and accommodation.

This will be useful for both legal representatives who work with victims of trafficking, as well as for support workers in providing an overview of judicial review challenges.

Time: 1:00 – 4:00 PM
Location: Online
Register here

Related Barristers: Claire Physsas

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

news
Brenda Efurhievwe’s article “Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals” published on Free Movement
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe
cases
Olivia succeeds in judicial review challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing for IPP prisoner
Olivia succeeded in challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing on grounds of procedural unfairness and a breach of Article 5(4) ECHR.
Olivia Beach
publications
“Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals – a light at the end of the tunnel?”
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe