Dharsha Jegatheeswaran secures unanimous not guilty verdict for her client charged with religiously aggravated intentional strangulation

Dharsha Jegatheeswaran’s client was charged with one count of religiously aggravated intentional strangulation.

The Crown’s case was that the Defendant had strangled an employee he supervised at work in an incident fuelled by Islamophobia. The complainant reported the alleged incident to police on the same day it was said to have occurred.

At the conclusion of the trial the jury returned a unanimous verdict of not guilty after less than an hour of deliberation.

Dharsha was instructed by Antoinette Woghiren of A&A Law.

Related Barristers: Dharsha Jegatheeswaran

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

news
Brenda Efurhievwe’s article “Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals” published on Free Movement
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe
cases
Olivia succeeds in judicial review challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing for IPP prisoner
Olivia succeeded in challenging the Parole Board’s refusal of an oral hearing on grounds of procedural unfairness and a breach of Article 5(4) ECHR.
Olivia Beach
publications
“Judicial discretion and burden of proof in civil penalty appeals – a light at the end of the tunnel?”
The article considers two County Court decisions which demonstrate novel approaches regarding the issues of judicial discretion and the burden of proof in appeals against civil penalties.
Brenda Efurhievwe