Dharsha represented two co-defendants charged with one count of aggravated trespass, arising from their activities as hunt monitors.

On the day of trial, the Crown made an application for adjournment which Dharsha successfully resisted, forcing the trial to proceed.

She made legal arguments focused on demonstrating the Crown had not proven its case in respect of two of the elements of Aggravated Trespass – the need for a distinct act beyond mere trespass, and an intention for said act to disrupt/obstruct/intimidate lawful activities.

The District Judge was persuaded the elements had not been made out in line with Dharsha’s legal submissions and acquitted both Ds.

Dharsha was instructed by Rosa Potters of Kellys Solicitors.