This week the Supreme Court is hearing an appeal on the lawfulness of sending asylum seekers to Rwanda pursuant to the Migration and Economic Development Partnership Scheme (‘MEDP scheme’).

A helpful summary of the issues has been drafted by Jed Pennington of Wilsons Solicitors who instructs Angelina Nicolaou as part of the legal team acting on behalf of Appellant ‘ASM’.

Our David Chirico is also instructed by Baker McKenzie on behalf of the UNHCR.

The Rwanda litigation: who is arguing what in the Supreme Court? – Free Movement