Rachel Francis looks at disclosure of documents from family court proceedings

The recent – and by now infamous – case of Re Nasrullah Mursalin [2019] EWCA Civ 1559, in which a paralegal was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment for disclosing papers from family proceedings to an immigration tribunal judge, has generated much concern amongst immigration practitioners about when it is permissible to disclose or rely upon documents from family proceedings. Although Mr Mursalin’s sentence was quashed by the Court of Appeal, the case serves as a salutary reminder of the need to be on top of this area of law.

In an article for Free Movement, Rachel Francis looks at:

  • The privacy principles that operate in the family court and Family Division
  • What amounts to a contempt of court
  • What documents can or cannot be disclosed
  • Communications about proceedings
  • Restrictions on public identification of children
  • How to obtain permission to disclose documents or rely on them in support of your client’s immigration case

Click here for the full story: https://www.freemovement.org.uk/disclosure-from-family-proceedings/

Related Barristers: Rachel Francis

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

cases
R v SC (Woolwich Crown Court)
Kitan Ososami’s client was charged with a section 18 GBH (wounding with intent) and possession of offensive weapons.
Kitan Ososami
cases
R v CR and KR [2025]
Dharsha secures acquittal of two hunt monitors charged with aggravated trespass
Dharsha Jegatheeswaran
news
The Undercover Policing Inquiry heard Opening Statements for Tranche 3 (Phase 1)
Angelina Nicolaou and Natalie Csengeri are Junior Counsel for the Co-Operating Group of Non-Police, Non-State Core Participants (‘NPSCPs’)
Angelina Nicolaou, Natalie Csengeri