Daniel Grütters assesses the impact of the Hemmati and Ismail cases on Dublin III procedures

In November, two important judgments were handed down concerning the legal regime governing immigration detention under the Dublin III Regulation; one by the Supreme Court and one by the High Court. In this two part entry for the Oxford Human Rights Hub Blog, Daniel Grütters summarises the key findings and considers the impact of these cases. Part I considers the findings of the Supreme Court in HemmatiPart II looks at the High Court judgment in Ismail and the relevance of the decisions for future cases.

In HemmatiDavid Chirico (being led by Michael Fordham QC) acted for the Second Respondent.

In IsmailDavid Chirico and Stephen Knight (led by Raza Husain QC) acted for the Respondent.

Daniel Grütters is David Chirico’s current pupil and will be taking instructions in immigration and housing from April 2020.

Related Barristers: David Chirico KC, Stephen Knight, Daniel Grütters

Updates

Latest News

Our latest cases, upcoming events and news

cases
R v SC (Woolwich Crown Court)
Kitan Ososami’s client was charged with a section 18 GBH (wounding with intent) and possession of offensive weapons.
Kitan Ososami
cases
R v CR and KR [2025]
Dharsha secures acquittal of two hunt monitors charged with aggravated trespass
Dharsha Jegatheeswaran
news
The Undercover Policing Inquiry heard Opening Statements for Tranche 3 (Phase 1)
Angelina Nicolaou and Natalie Csengeri are Junior Counsel for the Co-Operating Group of Non-Police, Non-State Core Participants (‘NPSCPs’)
Angelina Nicolaou, Natalie Csengeri